California High Speed Rail Issues

 
 

Altamont vs. Pacheco, and how routing affects success of the high-speed rail proposal. The devils ARE in the details.

(Click on graphic above to open story.)

Regional Trips Key to Energy & Greenhouse Gas Savings:

In this 2002 article, we proposed a high-speed bypass route and hybrid operation on the existing San Joaquin route so Central Valley cities could be spared the eardrum-shattering 220 mph service that the HSRA now admits will run on elevated tracks dividing cities.

Emulating European High-speed Route Structure:

All content © 2008, 2010 California Rail Foundation

By October 2002, HSR Project Clearly Had Been Hijacked:

All problems visible in the current plan can be traced back to unwise decisions made in 2001 and 2002, as this late 2002 CRN article documents.

HSR_files/HSRA%20letter%20on%20FPEIRS.pdf
7/8/08 FEIR/S Comment to HSRA
HSR_files/HSRAfinalpetition.pdf
FEIR/S Lawsuit
HSR_files/crfpressrelease80808.pdf
8/8/08 Lawsuit Press Release
 

Here are links to the filings made

by CRF and its environmental allies

on the inadequacy of the FEIR/S.

Bay-Central Valley FEIR/S

Tony Waller explains why the existing high-speed rail plan is a non-starter and tells what is needed for a success.

(Click on graphic above to open story.)

A Rail Professional Speaks Out on the HSRA Plan

European High Speed Rail Doesn’t Invade Neighborhoods

California’s High-speed Rail Authority has really devised something unique, a revival of Division of Highways plans to destroy cities statewide. The innovation is using 220 mph elevated trains in place of the elevated freeways of the 60’s and 70’s.

(Click on graphic above to open story.)

Gamed Traffic Data  Endangers High-Speed Rail Project

2001

2007

Faster Way to the Bay

European HSR Experts Say Altamont Has Advantages

Setec Study of Altamont and Hwy 101HSR_files/Altamont%20Report%20Ex%20C%20LoRes_1.pdf
Setec Drawing of new Altamont RouteHSR_files/setecaltamontsm.pdf
California Rail News articleHSR_files/altamontarticle.pdf

Final Proof that the California Project is an Engineering Scam

The Authority unveils its first segment and it is entirely without benefits to California rail transportation, but has $3 billion of needless viaducts through Congressman Jim Costa’s Fresno-area district.

(Click on graphic above to open story.)

James Mills and Richard Tolmach point out the advantages of an 80-mile project that would improve rail service statewide.

(Click on graphic above to open story.)